God and the Flying Spaghetti Monster

image

Dear Professor Craig,

The cumulative case for the existence for God proceeds from some data (physical constants, sentient souls, testimonies for miracles, etc.) to the existence of God as the best explanation of these data. There are some important objections. 1. Such inference does not show why theism is a better explanation than, say, the hypothesis of the existence of a very powerful Flying Spaghetti Monster. 2. Neither it says why some evil being – some powerful, malevolent being, say, something like Satan – is not a better explanation than God; especially when the existing evil is included in the data. How would you counter? Thank you very much.

Answer here:

http://www.reasonablefaith.org…

  • Share/Bookmark
This entry was posted in Apologetics, Atheism, Humor, Philosophy, Science. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>