A most excellent discussion on how to sift the science from the rhetoric (and avoid reality distortion fields) in the world of “climate change”.

By Jay Richards.

A December 18 Washington Post poll, released on the final day of the ill-fated Copenhagen climate summit, reported “four in ten Americans now saying that they place little or no trust in what scientists have to say about the environment.” Nor is the poll an outlier. Several recent polls have found “climate change” skepticism rising faster than sea levels on Planet Algore (not to be confused with Planet Earth, where sea levels remain relatively stable).

The global-warming scandal is bigger than one email leak.

This piece from the Wall Street Journal is a pretty good summary of what a lot of us are no doubt thinking about “global warming”. When scientific data is kept behind closed doors, unavailable, or classified, then why should we not be suspicious that there is really something else going on other than science. The fact that the masses in Copenhagen are apparently so slow or even so unwilling to respond to the points raised in an article such as this while singing to the same tune just fuels the fire. This seems to me to be NOT science, but ideology, running wild on tax-payers money.